logo
Product categories

EbookNice.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link.  https://ebooknice.com/page/post?id=faq


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookNice Team

(Ebook) Popular Efficacy in the Democratic Era: A Reexamination of Electoral Accountability in the United States, 1828-2000 by Peter F. Nardulli ISBN 9781400849451

  • SKU: EBN-51944300
Zoomable Image
$ 32 $ 40 (-20%)

Status:

Available

4.7

27 reviews
Instant download (eBook) Popular Efficacy in the Democratic Era: A Reexamination of Electoral Accountability in the United States, 1828-2000 after payment.
Authors:Peter F. Nardulli
Pages:272 pages.
Year:2013
Editon:Course Book
Publisher:Princeton University Press
Language:english
File Size:2.33 MB
Format:pdf
ISBNS:9781400849451
Categories: Ebooks

Product desciption

(Ebook) Popular Efficacy in the Democratic Era: A Reexamination of Electoral Accountability in the United States, 1828-2000 by Peter F. Nardulli ISBN 9781400849451

Social scientists have long criticized American voters for being "unsophisticated" in the way they acquire and use political information. The low level of political sophistication leaves them vulnerable to manipulation by political "elites," whose sway over voters is deemed incontrovertible and often decisive. In this book, Peter Nardulli challenges the conventional wisdom that citizens are "manageable fools," with little capacity to exercise independent judgment in the voting booth. Rather, he argues, voters are eminently capable of playing an efficacious role in democratic politics and of routinely demonstrating the ability to evaluate competing stewards in a discriminating manner. Nardulli's book offers a cognitively based model of voting and uses a normal vote approach to analyzing local-level election returns. It examines the entire sweep of United States presidential elections in the democratic era (1828 to 2000), making it the most encompassing empirical analysis of presidential voting to date. Nardulli's analysis separates presidential elections into three categories: those that produce a major, enduring change in voting patterns, those that represent a short-term deviation from prevailing voting patterns, and those in which the dominant party receives a resounding endorsement from the electorate. These "disequilibrating" elections have been routine in American electoral history, particularly after the adoption of the Progressive-Era reforms. Popular Efficacy in the Democratic Era provides a dramatically different picture of mass-elite linkages than most prior studies of American democracy, and an image of voters as being neither foolish nor manageable. Moreover, it shows why party elites must take proactive steps to provide for the core political desires of voters.
*Free conversion of into popular formats such as PDF, DOCX, DOC, AZW, EPUB, and MOBI after payment.

Related Products