logo
Product categories

EbookNice.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link.  https://ebooknice.com/page/post?id=faq


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookNice Team

(Ebook) De gustibus : arguing about taste and why we do it by Kivy, Peter ISBN 9780191809064, 9780198746782, 0191809063, 0198746784

  • SKU: EBN-5892626
Zoomable Image
$ 32 $ 40 (-20%)

Status:

Available

4.5

8 reviews
Instant download (eBook) De gustibus : arguing about taste and why we do it after payment.
Authors:Kivy, Peter
Pages:192 pages.
Year:2015
Editon:First edition
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Language:english
File Size:1.35 MB
Format:pdf
ISBNS:9780191809064, 9780198746782, 0191809063, 0198746784
Categories: Ebooks

Product desciption

(Ebook) De gustibus : arguing about taste and why we do it by Kivy, Peter ISBN 9780191809064, 9780198746782, 0191809063, 0198746784

In De Gustibus Peter Kivy deals with a question that has never been fully addressed by philosophers of art: why do we argue about art? We argue about the 'facts' of the world either to influence people's behaviour or simply to get them to see what we take to be the truth about the world. We argue over ethical matters, if we are ethical 'realists,' because we think we are arguing about 'facts' in the world. And we argue about ethics, if we are 'emotivists,' or are now what are called 'expressionists,' which is to say, people who think matters of ethics are simply matters of 'attitude,' to influence the behaviour of others. But why should we argue about works of art? There are no 'actions' we wish to motivate. Whether I think Bach is greater than Beethoven and you think the opposite, why should it matter to either of us to convince the other? This is a question that philosophers have never faced. Kivy claims here that we argue over taste because we think, mistakenly or not, that we are arguing over matters of fact.
*Free conversion of into popular formats such as PDF, DOCX, DOC, AZW, EPUB, and MOBI after payment.

Related Products