Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.
Please read the tutorial at this link. https://ebooknice.com/page/post?id=faq
We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.
For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.
EbookNice Team
Status:
Available4.7
7 reviewsISBN 10: 0198801289
ISBN 13: 9780198801283
Author: Lara Buchak
Lara Buchak sets out an original account of the principles that govern rational decision-making in the face of risk. A distinctive feature of these decisions is that individuals are forced to consider how their choices will turn out under various circumstances, and decide how to trade off the possibility that a choice will turn out well against the possibility that it will turn out poorly. The orthodox view is that there is only one acceptable way to do this: rational individuals must maximize expected utility. Buchak's contention, however, is that the orthodox theory (expected utility theory) dictates an overly narrow way in which considerations about risk can play a role in an individual's choices. Combining research from economics and philosophy, she argues for an alternative, more permissive, theory of decision-making: one that allows individuals to pay special attention to the worst-case or best-case scenario (among other 'global features' of gambles). This theory, risk-weighted expected utility theory, better captures the preferences of actual decision-makers. Furthermore, it isolates the distinct roles that beliefs, desires, and risk-attitudes play in decision-making. Finally, contra the orthodox view, Buchak argues that decision-makers whose preferences can be captured by risk-weighted expected utility theory are rational. Thus, Risk and Rationality is in many ways a vindication of the ordinary decision-maker—particularly his or her attitude towards risk—from the point of view of even ideal rationality.
I.1 Introduction
I.2 Chapter Summary
I.3 Terminology
1 Instrumental Rationality and Expected Utility Theory
1.1 Examples
1.2 Risk-Aversion and Expected Utility Theory
1.3 Risk-Aversion and Reasons
1.4 Non-Expected Utility Theories
2 Risk-Weighted Expected Utility
2.1 An Alternative Theory of Instrumental Rationality
2.2 The Risk Function
2.3 Examples Explained
2.4 Deviations from REU Theory
3 Representation
3.1 From Preferences to Beliefs and Desires
3.2 Representation Theorem for REU Maximizers
3.3 Comonotonicity and Global Properties
3.4 Separating Beliefs from Risk-Attitudes
4 Redescription
4.1 The Role of Rationality in Decision Theory
4.2 The Individuation Strategy
4.3 Local Individuation
4.4 Global Individuation
4.5 The Failure of the Individuation Strategy
5 Consistency
5.1 Decision-Theoretic Rationality
5.2 Coherent Consequentialist Preferences
5.3 The Sure-Thing Principle and the Independence Axiom
5.4 The Argument from Dominance and No Interaction Effects
6 Diachronic Choice
6.1 Three Diachronic Arguments
6.2 Diachronic Choice under Certainty
6.3 Diachronic Choice under Risk
6.4 Inconsistent Preferences?
6.5 The Cost of Global Sensitivity
7 Bookmaking and Packaging
7.1 Bookmaking Arguments
7.2 The Package Principle
7.3 The Hypothetical Long-Run Argument
7.4 The Motivational Long-Run Argument
7.5 Insurance
7.6 Carving up the World
8 Conclusion
Appendices
Appendix A: Representation Theorem
Appendix B: Axioms for EU theory
Appendix C: Tradeoff Equality and Utility Differences
risk and rationality
risk and rationality pdf
rationality (book)
risk online book
books on risk analysis
Tags: Lara Buchak, Risk, Rationality