(Ebook) Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them (2 Vol. Set) by Sita Ram Goel, Arun Shourie ISBN 9788185990934, 9788185990941, 818599093X, 8185990948

(Ebook) Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them (2 Vol. Set) by Sita Ram Goel, Arun Shourie ISBN 9788185990934, 9788185990941, 818599093X, 8185990948

Sita Ram Goel was an Indian religious and political activist, writer. He wrote extensively on the damage to Indian culture and heritage wrought by expansionist Islam and missionary activities of Christianity. In his later career he emerged as a commentator on Indian politics, and adhered to Hindu nationalism. Goel wrote regularly for the far right hindu organization called RSS's "Organiser" weekly, whose editor K. R. Malkani was his friend. In 1961–1962 he used the pseudonym Ekaki (solitary) while writing the series In Defence of Comrade Krishna Menon, critical of Indian National Congress leader Jawaharlal Nehru. Although the series was widely read and praised, he was later admonished by a leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) for being too focused on Nehru, and the series was discontinued. The collected series was published in December 1963 by Vaidya Gurudatta and an updated version released as Genesis and Growth of Nehruism thirty years later. However Goel's writings about Nehru in the Organiser cost him his job and disillusioned him of the RSS.The first volume includes a list of 2,000 mosques that he claims were built on Hindu temples, based primarily on the books of Muslim historians of the period or inscriptions found on mosques. The second volume excerpts from medieval histories and chronicles and from inscriptions concerning the destruction of Hindu, Jain and Buddhist temples. The authors claim that the material presented in the book as "The Tip of an Iceberg". The book restricts itself mainly to the study of Hindu temples destroyed and desecrated and converted into mosques and khanqahs without overlooking Muslim’s ideology of iconoclasm; here and there, it also mentions other theological props and concomitants of the iconoclastic ideology. In the book Ayodhya retains its importance, but it does not occupy the centre of discussion. In dealing with its subject, it exercises complete fidelity to truth; unlike secularist and Marxist writers, it do